Ty Beard - Bumbling Fat Wargames Nerd Lolyer High On His Own Farts

Getting your important paperwork in on time doesn't need any specific specialization or training.
It also didn't help that he was "wargaming" the whole thing. Filing your paperwork before 11:59PM on the deadline is like giving your opponent extra time to strategize!

Oops, I fatfingered the upload and now it's 12:01AM. :stupid:
 
He's probably not incompetent at most of the legal work he does. Problem was he's not a specialist at these kinds of cases and got overwhelmed by procedural hurdles I guess. Similarly, it would probably be dumb to hire a divoce attorney to defend against a murder charge. He should have given a referral to someone else if he didn't have that kind of experience. Also the TCPA is bullshit, and future lolsuits should be done in states without anti-SLAPP laws.
Yeah. The "Tylephone notary" screwup was probably something he'd done a dozen times in non-confrontational cases. Then he does it in a lawsuit where the other parties want to torpedo everything they file and it gets caught and called out and massively undermined their case.

I will say, he made a really good save by getting the depositions all done before the TCPA motion was filed (the defendants' strategy was going to be to depose Vic and then immediately file to stop discovery and prevent any further depositions). I give that a lot of credit as to helping Vic's public image outside of the lawsuit (lawtwitter idiots with their out-of-context gifs can only try to rewrite the narrative, ineffectively). But at the end of the day he's more of a businessman than a litigant, and there's just a lot that doesn't necessarily translate from his usual contract law... where both sides mostly want to come together and make it work, and nobody's going to question whether the documents were all notarized properly.
 
1661482036101.png


Caught him goofing off again watching livestreams. Legal Mindset said he wanted to have him on to talk about the Vic case. Frankly, that's probably the best case to get him to actually talk about it cause Rekieta is boomer guarding.
 
When actors beat #metoo stuff, they do so by keeping a low profile and going through the boring legitimate channels of PR and law firms that are experts in cleaning up these sorts of messes...rather than engaging with the clownish right wing e-grifter vortex and hiring Teh Ep1c Intarwebz Lolyer of D00m!!1!1
 
When actors beat #metoo stuff, they do so by keeping a low profile and going through the boring legitimate channels of PR and law firms that are experts in cleaning up these sorts of messes...rather than engaging with the clownish right wing e-grifter vortex and hiring Teh Ep1c Intarwebz Lolyer of D00m!!1!1
He did that and they told him to apologize and look how that worked out.
 
I'm just gonna say it because no one else will:

Fuck Ty Beard.

The defamation case for Vic's lawsuit was legitimate and blatantly obvious to anyone paying attention. Any competent lawyer could've had a field day exposing Jamie and Monica for the abhorrent, sociopathic liars that they are yet Ty managed to fuck up the notarizing of the affidavits and somehow managed to offer a subpar case that even a lazy judge like Chupp could see was flawed.

I've said before I had contempt for Judge Chupp for what happened to Vic's lawsuit but my contempt is now fully directed at Ty Beard. I understand and respect the fact that he owned up to failing but he failed so spectacularly that I can never truly forgive him for being so incompetent.
 
I'm just gonna say it because no one else will:

Fuck Ty Beard.

The defamation case for Vic's lawsuit was legitimate and blatantly obvious to anyone paying attention. Any competent lawyer could've had a field day exposing Jamie and Monica for the abhorrent, sociopathic liars that they are yet Ty managed to fuck up the notarizing of the affidavits and somehow managed to offer a subpar case that even a lazy judge like Chupp could see was flawed.

I've said before I had contempt for Judge Chupp for what happened to Vic's lawsuit but my contempt is now fully directed at Ty Beard. I understand and respect the fact that he owned up to failing but he failed so spectacularly that I can never truly forgive him for being so incompetent.
I think pretty much anyone who's not KickVic and read the appellate decision and how monumentally fatal his fuck up was has been going fuck Ty Beard. It's not a radical position.

Feel bad for Vic, a man who was wronged by both allies and enemies, but don't sperg out.
 
I understand and respect the fact that he owned up to failing but he failed so spectacularly that I can never truly forgive him for being so incompetent.
It's especially bad in light of having appeared on a stream the night before and talking a bunch of mad shit before filing a botched brief late, then overreacting again and withdrawing the only evidence he had for most of the case. I'm not particularly thrilled with the appeal's court's interpretation of the Rule 11 agreement either, and think signing it was a huge blunder too, but three appellate judges in Texas agree on that. And deciding what these rules m

Apparently if you sign one of these in Texas, you'd best expect no wriggle room or "substantial compliance" excuses.

Tbh I'm too disappointed even to be seething about it.
 

Nick had Ty on the panel. I didn't bother watching cause the streams he has with his wife are bordeline unwatchable. The Rumble chat is somehow more hugboxy than the Youtube chat so I doubt anyone grilled Ty on anything. Maybe someone did but Rumble is terrible to scrub through.
 
Realistically, if Ty was actually smart about any of this he would've appeared on Nick's show only once and leave it at that until the lawsuit was over. If Ty had done just that and focused completely on the lawsuit he wouldn't have been so incompetent.

Even if Chupp had ruled the same way he did regardless we would have actual reason to blame Chupp's laziness and the appeals court for what happened in the end.
 
I came here to get some insight on what happened with Beard's handling of the case. I found 20 pages of embarrassing slobber-knobbing and 10 pages of alternating weak criticism and concentrated cope. Does anyone have a distilled version of the case for and against Mr. Beard?
Ty was doing all right with the case (at least, no worse than the weirdo Lemwaaah) and had enough evidence to get Vic at least partially through the TCPA. Except he didn't correctly file crucial, TCPA-defeating evidence which get the lawsuit shitcanned pre-trial.

TLDR: Ty tripped on his own shoelaces at the 1 yard line, and his client is the one who has to pay for borderline malpractice blunder.
 
Ty correctly predicted that the defendants' strategy was going to be to get video deposition of Vic and then file their TCPA motions to stay discovery, and at least as far as the court of public opinion he got a pretty big win for Vic by boxing them out of that strategy. IIRC the judge was like "wait, you weren't going to do that were you?" and they were like "oh... oh of course not..." (they totally were). So we actually got video depositions of Ron and Monica, which we wouldn't have had otherwise.

But then, yeah, the tylerphone notary fiasco occurred. Basically Ty thought that he could accept an affidavit via email/telephone and put his notary stamp on it. Apparently in Texas you need the super seekret decoder ring remote notary license to do that, and Ty was just a plain ol' regular notary. Jamie Marchi's lawyer got suspicious due to the fact that the guy was publicly known to be hours away from Ty's office around the same time, and requested that Ty provide his notary logs. Ty attempted to repair the notary issue by withdrawing the defective affidavit and re-filing effectively the same thing as an unsworn statement, but the affidavit had been filed last-minute. Chupp allowed the late withdrawal of the affidavit, but rejected the late submittal of the unsworn statement. That was a huge problem for Vic's case because basically all of the evidence that would've been needed to overcome TCPA was contained in that affidavit.

I still maintain that Chupp misapplied Texas law by interpreting "response" to include an amended complaint, though. I could perhaps see rationale as to why a plaintiff shouldn't be allowed to file an amended complaint after the defendant's TCPA motion has been filed, but "rule 11 agreement says no response after $date" ain't it, chief.
 
Ty was doing all right with the case (at least, no worse than the weirdo Lemwaaah) and had enough evidence to get Vic at least partially through the TCPA. Except he didn't correctly file crucial, TCPA-defeating evidence which get the lawsuit shitcanned pre-trial.

TLDR: Ty tripped on his own shoelaces at the 1 yard line, and his client is the one who has to pay for borderline malpractice blunder.
It's not borderline. It is malpractice. Ty should know he's not a remote notary and then submitting it anyway is what was ultimately punted the case.
 
It's worth posting this here, but Ty Beard is a consistent defender of Nick Rekieta. Just hours after the release of documents showing Nick's 9 year old daughter tested positive for a huge amount of cocaine, Ty is there in Nick's chat praising Nick, criticizing his detractors, sending him money, and saying he's proud to call him his friend.

However much Vic Mignogna got out of Ty's services for free, it wasn't enough. Vic should've cleaned this bloviating shitbag out for everything he was worth.
 
Last edited:
Back